2012 • Fiat
Bravo
Fiat Bravo 1.6 Multijet (120 Hp) 2012Overall Score62.5/100
2012 Fiat Bravo vs 2012 Great Wall Cool Bear Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2012 • Great Wall
Cool Bear
Great Wall Cool Bear Cool 2012Overall Score63.25/100
WINNER
Great Wall Cool Bear
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
62.5–63.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Fiat BravoSpecificationGreat Wall Cool Bear
FiatMakeGreat Wall
BravoModelCool Bear
2012Model year2012
HatchbackBody typeMinivan
5Seats5
5Doors5
Performance
Fiat BravoSpecificationGreat Wall Cool Bear
10,5 s0–100 km/h—
195 km/hTop speed160 km/h
1598 ccEngine displacement1497 cc
120 HPPower105 HP
300 NmTorque138 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Fiat BravoSpecificationGreat Wall Cool Bear
DieselFuel typePetrol
57 ltFuel tank45 lt
6,3 ltUrban consumption—
4,1 ltExtra-urban consumption—
4,9 ltAverage consumption6,7 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Fiat BravoSpecificationGreat Wall Cool Bear
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears5
205/55 R16Tyre size—
YesABS—
Dimensions
Fiat BravoSpecificationGreat Wall Cool Bear
4336 mmLength3951 mm
1792 mmWidth1695 mm
1498 mmHeight1634 mm
1320 KgWeight1260 Kg
2600 mmWheelbase2499 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2012 Fiat Bravo and 2012 Great Wall Cool Bear approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Great Wall Cool Bear leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…