DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 Nissan AD vs 2012 Great Wall Cool Bear Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Great Wall Cool Bear

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

62.5–63.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

NissanMakeGreat Wall
ADModelCool Bear
2012Model year2012
EstateBody typeMinivan
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

0 km/hTop speed160 km/h
1597 ccEngine displacement1497 cc
109 HPPower105 HP
150 NmTorque138 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
41 ltFuel tank45 lt
—Average consumption6,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears5

Dimensions

4395 mmLength3951 mm
1695 mmWidth1695 mm
1500 mmHeight1634 mm
1250 KgWeight1260 Kg
2600 mmWheelbase2499 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 Nissan AD and 2012 Great Wall Cool Bear approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Great Wall Cool Bear leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…