DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 Great Wall Cool Bear vs 2012 Fiat Bravo Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Great Wall Cool Bear

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

63.25–62.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Great WallMakeFiat
Cool BearModelBravo
2012Model year2012
MinivanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h10,5 s
160 km/hTop speed195 km/h
1497 ccEngine displacement1598 cc
105 HPPower120 HP
138 NmTorque300 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
45 ltFuel tank57 lt
—Urban consumption6,3 lt
—Extra-urban consumption4,1 lt
6,7 ltAverage consumption4,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears6
—Tyre size205/55 R16
—ABSYes

Dimensions

3951 mmLength4336 mm
1695 mmWidth1792 mm
1634 mmHeight1498 mm
1260 KgWeight1320 Kg
2499 mmWheelbase2600 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 Great Wall Cool Bear and 2012 Fiat Bravo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Great Wall Cool Bear leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…