DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 GMC Terrain vs 2014 Ford Flex Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Flex

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

80.75–81.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

GMCMakeFord
TerrainModelFlex
2016Model year2014
SUVBody typeSUV
5Seats6-7
5Doors5

Performance

0 km/hTop speed0 km/h
3564 ccEngine displacement3496 cc
301 HPPower364 HP
367 NmTorque475 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
68 ltFuel tank71 lt
13,8 ltUrban consumption14,7 lt
9,8 ltExtra-urban consumption10,2 lt
—Average consumption13,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
6Gears6
235/60 R17; 235/55 R18; 235/55 R19Tyre size235/60 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4771 mmLength5130 mm
1849 mmWidth1930 mm
1684 mmHeight1727 mm
1829 KgWeight—
2858 mmWheelbase2995 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 GMC Terrain and 2014 Ford Flex approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Flex leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…