DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Ford Explorer vs 2016 GMC Terrain Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Explorer

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

81.5–80.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FordMakeGMC
ExplorerModelTerrain
2016Model year2016
SUVBody typeSUV
7Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

6,4 s0–100 km/h—
193 km/hTop speed0 km/h
3497 ccEngine displacement3564 cc
340 HPPower301 HP
485 NmTorque367 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank68 lt
14,7 ltUrban consumption13,8 lt
10,7 ltExtra-urban consumption9,8 lt
13,1 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6 SelectShiftGears6
255/50 R20Tyre size235/60 R17; 235/55 R18; 235/55 R19
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5019 mmLength4771 mm
1988 mmWidth1849 mm
1788 mmHeight1684 mm
—Weight1829 Kg
2860 mmWheelbase2858 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Ford Explorer and 2016 GMC Terrain approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Explorer leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…