DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2014 Ford Taurus vs 2016 GMC Terrain Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Taurus

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

81.75–80.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FordMakeGMC
TaurusModelTerrain
2014Model year2016
SedanBody typeSUV
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

0 km/hTop speed0 km/h
3496 ccEngine displacement3564 cc
365 HPPower301 HP
475 NmTorque367 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
72 ltFuel tank68 lt
13,8 ltUrban consumption13,8 lt
9,4 ltExtra-urban consumption9,8 lt
11,7 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6 SelectShiftGears6
255/45 R19Tyre size235/60 R17; 235/55 R18; 235/55 R19
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5154 mmLength4771 mm
1935 mmWidth1849 mm
1542 mmHeight1684 mm
1970 KgWeight1829 Kg
2868 mmWheelbase2858 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2014 Ford Taurus and 2016 GMC Terrain approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Taurus leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…