DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 GMC Terrain vs 2016 Ford Explorer Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Explorer

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

80.75–81.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

GMCMakeFord
TerrainModelExplorer
2016Model year2016
SUVBody typeSUV
5Seats7
5Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h6,4 s
0 km/hTop speed193 km/h
3564 ccEngine displacement3497 cc
301 HPPower340 HP
367 NmTorque485 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
68 ltFuel tank70 lt
13,8 ltUrban consumption14,7 lt
9,8 ltExtra-urban consumption10,7 lt
—Average consumption13,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
6Gears6 SelectShift
235/60 R17; 235/55 R18; 235/55 R19Tyre size255/50 R20
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4771 mmLength5019 mm
1849 mmWidth1988 mm
1684 mmHeight1788 mm
1829 KgWeight—
2858 mmWheelbase2860 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 GMC Terrain and 2016 Ford Explorer approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Explorer leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…