DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 GMC Terrain vs 2016 Alfa Romeo Giulia Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

GMC Terrain

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

70.5–69.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

GMCMakeAlfa Romeo
TerrainModelGiulia
2016Model year2016
SUVBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

—0–100 km/h6,6 s
0 km/hTop speed146 km/h
2384 ccEngine displacement1995 cc
182 HPPower200 HP
232 NmTorque330 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
68 ltFuel tank58 lt
10,7 ltUrban consumption8,4 lt
7,4 ltExtra-urban consumption4,6 lt
—Average consumption6,0 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
6Gears8
235/60 R17; 235/55 R18; 235/55 R19Tyre size225/55 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4771 mmLength4643 mm
1849 mmWidth1860 mm
1684 mmHeight1436 mm
1748 KgWeight1429 Kg
2858 mmWheelbase2820 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 GMC Terrain and 2016 Alfa Romeo Giulia approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, GMC Terrain leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…