DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Mitsubishi Outlander vs 2016 GMC Terrain Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

GMC Terrain

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

69.75–70.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MitsubishiMakeGMC
OutlanderModelTerrain
2016Model year2016
SUVBody typeSUV
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

10,2 s0–100 km/h—
200 km/hTop speed0 km/h
2268 ccEngine displacement2384 cc
150 HPPower182 HP
380 NmTorque232 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank68 lt
6,2 ltUrban consumption10,7 lt
4,8 ltExtra-urban consumption7,4 lt
5,3 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
—Tyre size235/60 R17; 235/55 R18; 235/55 R19
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4695 mmLength4771 mm
1810 mmWidth1849 mm
1680 mmHeight1684 mm
1600 KgWeight1748 Kg
2670 mmWheelbase2858 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Mitsubishi Outlander and 2016 GMC Terrain approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, GMC Terrain leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…