DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Alfa Romeo Giulia vs 2016 GMC Terrain Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

GMC Terrain

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

69.75–70.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Alfa RomeoMakeGMC
GiuliaModelTerrain
2016Model year2016
SedanBody typeSUV
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

6,6 s0–100 km/h—
146 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1995 ccEngine displacement2384 cc
200 HPPower182 HP
330 NmTorque232 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
58 ltFuel tank68 lt
8,4 ltUrban consumption10,7 lt
4,6 ltExtra-urban consumption7,4 lt
6,0 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
8Gears6
225/55 R16Tyre size235/60 R17; 235/55 R18; 235/55 R19
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4643 mmLength4771 mm
1860 mmWidth1849 mm
1436 mmHeight1684 mm
1429 KgWeight1748 Kg
2820 mmWheelbase2858 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Alfa Romeo Giulia and 2016 GMC Terrain approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, GMC Terrain leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…