DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 GMC Canyon vs 2012 Volvo S40 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

GMC Canyon

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

68.5–67.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

GMC CanyonSpecificationVolvo S40
GMCMakeVolvo
CanyonModelS40
2012Model year2012
Pick-upBody typeSedan
5/6Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

GMC CanyonSpecificationVolvo S40
—0–100 km/h7,2 s
0 km/hTop speed0 km/h
2921 ccEngine displacement2521 cc
185 HPPower230 HP
258 NmTorque320 Nm
4Cylinders5

Fuel & Consumption

GMC CanyonSpecificationVolvo S40
PetrolFuel typePetrol
74 ltFuel tank62 lt
11,7 ltUrban consumption13,5 lt
9,0 ltExtra-urban consumption6,5 lt
—Average consumption9,0 lt

Transmission & Chassis

GMC CanyonSpecificationVolvo S40
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
205/75 R15; 225/70 R15Tyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

GMC CanyonSpecificationVolvo S40
5260 mmLength4476 mm
1717 mmWidth1770 mm
1656 mmHeight1454 mm
1668 KgWeight1478 Kg
3200 mmWheelbase2640 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 GMC Canyon and 2012 Volvo S40 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, GMC Canyon leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…