DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 Toyota Highlander vs 2012 GMC Canyon Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Toyota Highlander

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

69.25–68.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ToyotaMakeGMC
HighlanderModelCanyon
2012Model year2012
SUVBody typePick-up
7Seats5/6
5Doors4

Performance

8,4 s0–100 km/h—
180 km/hTop speed0 km/h
3311 ccEngine displacement2921 cc
212 HPPower185 HP
287 NmTorque258 Nm
6Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Hybrid – Petrol / ElectricFuel typePetrol
72 ltFuel tank74 lt
9,4 ltUrban consumption11,7 lt
8,7 ltExtra-urban consumption9,0 lt
9,0 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

—DrivetrainRear-wheel drive
—Gears5
—Tyre size205/75 R15; 225/70 R15
—ABSYes

Dimensions

4785 mmLength5260 mm
1910 mmWidth1717 mm
1760 mmHeight1656 mm
2045 KgWeight1668 Kg
2790 mmWheelbase3200 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 Toyota Highlander and 2012 GMC Canyon approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Toyota Highlander leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…