DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1988 Geo Tracker vs 1984 BMW 3 Serisi Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Geo Tracker

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

51.5–51.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

GeoMakeBMW
TrackerModel3 Serisi
1988Model year1984
Off-road vehicleBody typeSedan
—Seats5
—Doors2

Performance

—0–100 km/h14,8 s
0 km/hTop speed154 km/h
1590 ccEngine displacement1573 cc
97 HPPower75 HP
0 NmTorque110 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
0 ltFuel tank58 lt
—Urban consumption10,5 lt
—Extra-urban consumption6,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

—DrivetrainRear-wheel drive
3Gears4
205/75 R15Tyre size165/80 R13

Dimensions

—Length4355 mm
—Width1610 mm
—Height1380 mm
—Weight1010 Kg
—Wheelbase2536 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1988 Geo Tracker and 1984 BMW 3 Serisi approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Geo Tracker leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…