DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1984 BMW 3 Serisi vs 1988 Geo Tracker Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Geo Tracker

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

51.25–51.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

BMWMakeGeo
3 SerisiModelTracker
1984Model year1988
SedanBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats—
2Doors—

Performance

14,8 s0–100 km/h—
154 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1573 ccEngine displacement1590 cc
75 HPPower97 HP
110 NmTorque0 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
58 ltFuel tank0 lt
10,5 ltUrban consumption—
6,8 ltExtra-urban consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain—
4Gears3
165/80 R13Tyre size205/75 R15

Dimensions

4355 mmLength—
1610 mmWidth—
1380 mmHeight—
1010 KgWeight—
2536 mmWheelbase—

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1984 BMW 3 Serisi and 1988 Geo Tracker approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Geo Tracker leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…