DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1986 Audi Coupe vs 1988 Geo Tracker Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Geo Tracker

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

51.25–51.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

AudiMakeGeo
CoupeModelTracker
1986Model year1988
CoupeBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats—
2Doors—

Performance

11,0 s0–100 km/h—
172 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1781 ccEngine displacement1590 cc
90 HPPower97 HP
145 NmTorque0 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
68 ltFuel tank0 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain—
5Gears3
175/70 R13Tyre size205/75 R15

Dimensions

4421 mmLength—
1682 mmWidth—
1350 mmHeight—
950 KgWeight—
2538 mmWheelbase—

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1986 Audi Coupe and 1988 Geo Tracker approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Geo Tracker leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…