E-Kıyasla
DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1988 Geo Tracker vs 1988 Audi 100 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Geo Tracker

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

51.5–51.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Geo TrackerSpecificationAudi 100
GeoMakeAudi
TrackerModel100
1988Model year1988
Off-road vehicleBody typeSedan
—Seats5
—Doors4

Performance

Geo TrackerSpecificationAudi 100
—0–100 km/h12,0 s
0 km/hTop speed176 km/h
1590 ccEngine displacement1781 cc
97 HPPower90 HP
0 NmTorque145 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Geo TrackerSpecificationAudi 100
PetrolFuel typePetrol
0 ltFuel tank80 lt
—Average consumption10,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Geo TrackerSpecificationAudi 100
—DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
3Gears4
205/75 R15Tyre size185/70 R14

Dimensions

Geo TrackerSpecificationAudi 100
—Length4793 mm
—Width1814 mm
—Height1422 mm
—Weight1080 Kg
—Wheelbase2687 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1988 Geo Tracker and 1988 Audi 100 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Geo Tracker leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

1988 Audi 80VS1988 Geo TrackerAudi 80 vs Geo Tracker1988 and 1988 model years1988 Audi 100VS1988 Geo TrackerAudi 100 vs Geo Tracker1988 and 1988 model years1986 Audi CoupeVS1988 Geo TrackerAudi Coupe vs Geo Tracker1986 and 1988 model years1990 Geo StormVS1988 Geo TrackerGeo Storm vs Geo Tracker1990 and 1988 model yearsImage unavailableVS1988 Geo TrackerBMW 3 Serisi vs Geo Tracker1984 and 1988 model years

Comments are loading…