1988 • Geo
Tracker
Geo Tracker 1.6 (97 Hp) 1988Overall Score51.5/100
1988 Geo Tracker vs 1990 Geo Storm Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1990 • Geo
Storm
Geo Storm 1.6i Turbo (130 Hp) 1990Overall Score52.5/100
WINNER
Geo Storm
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
51.5–52.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Geo TrackerSpecificationGeo Storm
GeoMakeGeo
TrackerModelStorm
1988Model year1990
Off-road vehicleBody typeCoupe
—Seats4
—Doors2
Performance
Geo TrackerSpecificationGeo Storm
—0–100 km/h12,4 s
0 km/hTop speed200 km/h
1590 ccEngine displacement1588 cc
97 HPPower130 HP
0 NmTorque0 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Geo TrackerSpecificationGeo Storm
PetrolFuel typePetrol
0 ltFuel tank47 lt
—Urban consumption13 lt
—Extra-urban consumption8 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Geo TrackerSpecificationGeo Storm
—DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
3Gears5
205/75 R15Tyre size205/50 R15
—ABSYes
Dimensions
Geo TrackerSpecificationGeo Storm
—Length4150 mm
—Width1695 mm
—Height1300 mm
—Weight1010 Kg
—Wheelbase2450 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1988 Geo Tracker and 1990 Geo Storm approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Geo Storm leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…