1994 • Geo
Tracker
Geo Tracker 1.6 16V (95 Hp) 1994Overall Score51.5/100
1994 Geo Tracker vs 1994 Audi 80 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1994 • Audi
80
Audi 80 1.6 (70 Hp) 1994Overall Score51.25/100
WINNER
Geo Tracker
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.
51.5–51.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Geo TrackerSpecificationAudi 80
GeoMakeAudi
TrackerModel80
1994Model year1994
Off-road vehicleBody typeSedan
4Seats5
2Doors4
Performance
Geo TrackerSpecificationAudi 80
—0–100 km/h14,1 s
0 km/hTop speed168 km/h
1590 ccEngine displacement1595 cc
95 HPPower70 HP
132 NmTorque118 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Geo TrackerSpecificationAudi 80
PetrolFuel typePetrol
42 ltFuel tank66 lt
—Urban consumption9,9 lt
—Extra-urban consumption5,5 lt
9,4 ltAverage consumption6,9 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Geo TrackerSpecificationAudi 80
4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
205/75 R15Tyre size175/70 R14
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Geo TrackerSpecificationAudi 80
3620 mmLength4405 mm
1630 mmWidth1695 mm
1654 mmHeight1395 mm
1075 KgWeight1030 Kg
2200 mmWheelbase2545 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1994 Geo Tracker and 1994 Audi 80 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Geo Tracker leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…