1994 • Audi
80
Audi 80 1.6 (70 Hp) 1994Overall Score51.25/100
1994 Audi 80 vs 1994 Geo Tracker Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1994 • Geo
Tracker
Geo Tracker 1.6 16V (95 Hp) 1994Overall Score51.5/100
WINNER
Geo Tracker
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.
51.25–51.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Audi 80SpecificationGeo Tracker
AudiMakeGeo
80ModelTracker
1994Model year1994
SedanBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats4
4Doors2
Performance
Audi 80SpecificationGeo Tracker
14,1 s0–100 km/h—
168 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1595 ccEngine displacement1590 cc
70 HPPower95 HP
118 NmTorque132 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Audi 80SpecificationGeo Tracker
PetrolFuel typePetrol
66 ltFuel tank42 lt
9,9 ltUrban consumption—
5,5 ltExtra-urban consumption—
6,9 ltAverage consumption9,4 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Audi 80SpecificationGeo Tracker
Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears5
175/70 R14Tyre size205/75 R15
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Audi 80SpecificationGeo Tracker
4405 mmLength3620 mm
1695 mmWidth1630 mm
1395 mmHeight1654 mm
1030 KgWeight1075 Kg
2545 mmWheelbase2200 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1994 Audi 80 and 1994 Geo Tracker approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Geo Tracker leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…