1992 • Geo
Storm
Geo Storm 1.6i Turbo (130 Hp) 1992Overall Score52.5/100
1992 Geo Storm vs 1992 Mitsubishi Space Wagon Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1992 • Mitsubishi
Space Wagon
Mitsubishi Space Wagon 2.0 GLXi (N33W) 1992Overall Score53.25/100
WINNER
Mitsubishi Space Wagon
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
52.5–53.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Geo StormSpecificationMitsubishi Space Wagon
GeoMakeMitsubishi
StormModelSpace Wagon
1992Model year1992
CoupeBody typeMinivan
4Seats7
2Doors5
Performance
Geo StormSpecificationMitsubishi Space Wagon
12,4 s0–100 km/h11,2 s
200 km/hTop speed185 km/h
1588 ccEngine displacement1997 cc
130 HPPower133 HP
0 NmTorque176 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Geo StormSpecificationMitsubishi Space Wagon
PetrolFuel typePetrol
47 ltFuel tank60 lt
13 ltUrban consumption—
8 ltExtra-urban consumption—
—Average consumption9,1 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Geo StormSpecificationMitsubishi Space Wagon
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
205/50 R15Tyre size185/70 R14
YesABS—
Dimensions
Geo StormSpecificationMitsubishi Space Wagon
4150 mmLength4515 mm
1695 mmWidth1695 mm
1300 mmHeight1615 mm
1010 KgWeight1351 Kg
2450 mmWheelbase2720 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1992 Geo Storm and 1992 Mitsubishi Space Wagon approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Mitsubishi Space Wagon leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…