DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1992 Honda Concerto vs 1992 Geo Storm Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Honda Concerto

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

53.25–52.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

HondaMakeGeo
ConcertoModelStorm
1992Model year1992
HatchbackBody typeCoupe
5Seats4
5Doors2

Performance

10,0 s0–100 km/h12,4 s
190 km/hTop speed200 km/h
1590 ccEngine displacement1588 cc
122 HPPower130 HP
140 NmTorque0 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank47 lt
9,8 ltUrban consumption13 lt
7,1 ltExtra-urban consumption8 lt
9,1 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
175/70 R13; 185/60 R14Tyre size205/50 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4265 mmLength4150 mm
1690 mmWidth1695 mm
1395 mmHeight1300 mm
1080 KgWeight1010 Kg
2550 mmWheelbase2450 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1992 Honda Concerto and 1992 Geo Storm approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Honda Concerto leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…