DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1992 Honda CRX vs 1992 Geo Storm Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Honda CRX

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

53.25–52.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Honda CRXSpecificationGeo Storm
HondaMakeGeo
CRXModelStorm
1992Model year1992
CoupeBody typeCoupe
2Seats4
2Doors2

Performance

Honda CRXSpecificationGeo Storm
8,7 s0–100 km/h12,4 s
182 km/hTop speed200 km/h
1590 ccEngine displacement1588 cc
125 HPPower130 HP
144 NmTorque0 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Honda CRXSpecificationGeo Storm
PetrolFuel typePetrol
45 ltFuel tank47 lt
8,9 ltUrban consumption13 lt
5,9 ltExtra-urban consumption8 lt
7,5 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Honda CRXSpecificationGeo Storm
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/60 R14 HTyre size205/50 R15
—ABSYes

Dimensions

Honda CRXSpecificationGeo Storm
4005 mmLength4150 mm
1695 mmWidth1695 mm
1255 mmHeight1300 mm
1000 KgWeight1010 Kg
2370 mmWheelbase2450 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1992 Honda CRX and 1992 Geo Storm approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Honda CRX leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…