DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1992 Geo Storm vs 1992 Mazda 626 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda 626

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

52.5–53.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Geo StormSpecificationMazda 626
GeoMakeMazda
StormModel626
1992Model year1992
CoupeBody typeSedan
4Seats5
2Doors4

Performance

Geo StormSpecificationMazda 626
12,4 s0–100 km/h10,1 s
200 km/hTop speed190 km/h
1588 ccEngine displacement1840 cc
130 HPPower105 HP
0 NmTorque155 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Geo StormSpecificationMazda 626
PetrolFuel typePetrol
47 ltFuel tank60 lt
13 ltUrban consumption10,5 lt
8 ltExtra-urban consumption6,2 lt
—Average consumption8,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Geo StormSpecificationMazda 626
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
205/50 R15Tyre size185/70 R14 88 H
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Geo StormSpecificationMazda 626
4150 mmLength4695 mm
1695 mmWidth1750 mm
1300 mmHeight1400 mm
1010 KgWeight1150 Kg
2450 mmWheelbase2610 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1992 Geo Storm and 1992 Mazda 626 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda 626 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…