1992 • Geo
Storm
Geo Storm 1.6i Turbo (130 Hp) 1992Overall Score52.5/100
1992 Geo Storm vs 1992 Lotus Elan Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1992 • Lotus
Elan
Lotus Elan 1.6 i 16V (132 Hp) 1992Overall Score53.25/100
WINNER
Lotus Elan
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
52.5–53.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Geo StormSpecificationLotus Elan
GeoMakeLotus
StormModelElan
1992Model year1992
CoupeBody typeCabriolet
4Seats2
2Doors2
Performance
Geo StormSpecificationLotus Elan
12,4 s0–100 km/h8,2 s
200 km/hTop speed196 km/h
1588 ccEngine displacement1588 cc
130 HPPower132 HP
0 NmTorque142 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Geo StormSpecificationLotus Elan
PetrolFuel typePetrol
47 ltFuel tank46 lt
13 ltUrban consumption10,9 lt
8 ltExtra-urban consumption6,9 lt
—Average consumption8 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Geo StormSpecificationLotus Elan
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
205/50 R15Tyre size205/50 R15
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Geo StormSpecificationLotus Elan
4150 mmLength3900 mm
1695 mmWidth1735 mm
1300 mmHeight1230 mm
1010 KgWeight995 Kg
2450 mmWheelbase2250 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1992 Geo Storm and 1992 Lotus Elan approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Lotus Elan leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…