DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1992 Geo Storm vs 1992 Lancia Dedra Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Lancia Dedra

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

52.5–53.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

GeoMakeLancia
StormModelDedra
1992Model year1992
CoupeBody typeSedan
4Seats5
2Doors4

Performance

12,4 s0–100 km/h10,8 s
200 km/hTop speed195 km/h
1588 ccEngine displacement1995 cc
130 HPPower113 HP
0 NmTorque156 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
47 ltFuel tank63 lt
13 ltUrban consumption—
8 ltExtra-urban consumption—
—Average consumption8,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
205/50 R15Tyre size185/60 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4150 mmLength4340 mm
1695 mmWidth1700 mm
1300 mmHeight1417 mm
1010 KgWeight1218 Kg
2450 mmWheelbase2540 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1992 Geo Storm and 1992 Lancia Dedra approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Lancia Dedra leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…