DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1992 Geo Storm vs 1992 Honda CRX Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Honda CRX

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

52.5–53.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Geo StormSpecificationHonda CRX
GeoMakeHonda
StormModelCRX
1992Model year1992
CoupeBody typeCoupe
4Seats2
2Doors2

Performance

Geo StormSpecificationHonda CRX
12,4 s0–100 km/h8,7 s
200 km/hTop speed182 km/h
1588 ccEngine displacement1590 cc
130 HPPower125 HP
0 NmTorque144 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Geo StormSpecificationHonda CRX
PetrolFuel typePetrol
47 ltFuel tank45 lt
13 ltUrban consumption8,9 lt
8 ltExtra-urban consumption5,9 lt
—Average consumption7,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Geo StormSpecificationHonda CRX
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
205/50 R15Tyre size185/60 R14 H
YesABS—

Dimensions

Geo StormSpecificationHonda CRX
4150 mmLength4005 mm
1695 mmWidth1695 mm
1300 mmHeight1255 mm
1010 KgWeight1000 Kg
2450 mmWheelbase2370 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1992 Geo Storm and 1992 Honda CRX approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Honda CRX leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…