DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1990 Geo Storm vs 1990 Volvo 940 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volvo 940

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

52.5–53.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Geo StormSpecificationVolvo 940
GeoMakeVolvo
StormModel940
1990Model year1990
CoupeBody typeSedan
4Seats5
2Doors4

Performance

Geo StormSpecificationVolvo 940
12,4 s0–100 km/h12,5 s
200 km/hTop speed173 km/h
1588 ccEngine displacement1986 cc
130 HPPower111 HP
0 NmTorque158 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Geo StormSpecificationVolvo 940
PetrolFuel typePetrol
47 ltFuel tank75 lt
13 ltUrban consumption13,4 lt
8 ltExtra-urban consumption7,3 lt
—Average consumption9,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Geo StormSpecificationVolvo 940
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
205/50 R15Tyre size195/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Geo StormSpecificationVolvo 940
4150 mmLength4871 mm
1695 mmWidth1750 mm
1300 mmHeight1425 mm
1010 KgWeight1370 Kg
2450 mmWheelbase2770 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1990 Geo Storm and 1990 Volvo 940 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volvo 940 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…