DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1990 Mazda MX-5 vs 1990 Geo Storm Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda MX-5

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

53.25–52.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Mazda MX-5SpecificationGeo Storm
MazdaMakeGeo
MX-5ModelStorm
1990Model year1990
CabrioletBody typeCoupe
2Seats4
2Doors2

Performance

Mazda MX-5SpecificationGeo Storm
8,7 s0–100 km/h12,4 s
185 km/hTop speed200 km/h
1598 ccEngine displacement1588 cc
115 HPPower130 HP
135 NmTorque0 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Mazda MX-5SpecificationGeo Storm
PetrolFuel typePetrol
48 ltFuel tank47 lt
9,6 ltUrban consumption13 lt
6,1 ltExtra-urban consumption8 lt
7,8 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Mazda MX-5SpecificationGeo Storm
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/60 R14 82 HTyre size205/50 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Mazda MX-5SpecificationGeo Storm
3975 mmLength4150 mm
1675 mmWidth1695 mm
1230 mmHeight1300 mm
955 KgWeight1010 Kg
2265 mmWheelbase2450 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1990 Mazda MX-5 and 1990 Geo Storm approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda MX-5 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…