DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1990 Geo Storm vs 1990 Tofas Tempra Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Tofas Tempra

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

52.5–53.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

GeoMakeTofas
StormModelTempra
1990Model year1990
CoupeBody typeSedan
4Seats5
2Doors4

Performance

12,4 s0–100 km/h10,1 s
200 km/hTop speed195 km/h
1588 ccEngine displacement1995 cc
130 HPPower119 HP
0 NmTorque162 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
47 ltFuel tank65 lt
13 ltUrban consumption9,4 lt
8 ltExtra-urban consumption5,6 lt
—Average consumption7,6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
205/50 R15Tyre size175/65 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4150 mmLength4355 mm
1695 mmWidth1695 mm
1300 mmHeight1445 mm
1010 KgWeight1150 Kg
2450 mmWheelbase2540 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1990 Geo Storm and 1990 Tofas Tempra approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Tofas Tempra leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…