DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1990 Geo Storm vs 1990 Subaru XT Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Geo Storm

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

52.5–51.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Geo StormSpecificationSubaru XT
GeoMakeSubaru
StormModelXT
1990Model year1990
CoupeBody typeCoupe
4Seats5
2Doors2

Performance

Geo StormSpecificationSubaru XT
12,4 s0–100 km/h—
200 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1588 ccEngine displacement1782 cc
130 HPPower98 HP
0 NmTorque140 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Geo StormSpecificationSubaru XT
PetrolFuel typePetrol
47 ltFuel tank60 lt
13 ltUrban consumption—
8 ltExtra-urban consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Geo StormSpecificationSubaru XT
Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears5
205/50 R15Tyre size185/70 HR 13
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Geo StormSpecificationSubaru XT
4150 mmLength4450 mm
1695 mmWidth1690 mm
1300 mmHeight1290 mm
1010 KgWeight1140 Kg
2450 mmWheelbase2465 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1990 Geo Storm and 1990 Subaru XT approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Geo Storm leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…