DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1990 Geo Storm vs 1990 Saab 900 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Saab 900

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

52.5–53.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Geo StormSpecificationSaab 900
GeoMakeSaab
StormModel900
1990Model year1990
CoupeBody typeHatchback
4Seats5
2Doors5

Performance

Geo StormSpecificationSaab 900
12,4 s0–100 km/h11,5 s
200 km/hTop speed175 km/h
1588 ccEngine displacement1985 cc
130 HPPower126 HP
0 NmTorque170 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Geo StormSpecificationSaab 900
PetrolFuel typePetrol
47 ltFuel tank63 lt
13 ltUrban consumption12,9 lt
8 ltExtra-urban consumption7,4 lt
—Average consumption10 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Geo StormSpecificationSaab 900
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
205/50 R15Tyre size185/65 TR15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Geo StormSpecificationSaab 900
4150 mmLength4680 mm
1695 mmWidth1690 mm
1300 mmHeight1420 mm
1010 KgWeight1200 Kg
2450 mmWheelbase2515 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1990 Geo Storm and 1990 Saab 900 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Saab 900 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…