1990 • Geo
Storm
Geo Storm 1.6i Turbo (130 Hp) 1990Overall Score52.5/100
1990 Geo Storm vs 1987 Opel Omega Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1987 • Opel
Omega
Opel Omega 1.8i (115 Hp) 1987Overall Score53.25/100
WINNER
Opel Omega
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
52.5–53.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Geo StormSpecificationOpel Omega
GeoMakeOpel
StormModelOmega
1990Model year1987
CoupeBody typeSedan
4Seats5
2Doors4
Performance
Geo StormSpecificationOpel Omega
12,4 s0–100 km/h13,0 s
200 km/hTop speed187 km/h
1588 ccEngine displacement1796 cc
130 HPPower115 HP
0 NmTorque160 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Geo StormSpecificationOpel Omega
PetrolFuel typePetrol
47 ltFuel tank75 lt
13 ltUrban consumption10,5 lt
8 ltExtra-urban consumption5,8 lt
—Average consumption7,7 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Geo StormSpecificationOpel Omega
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
205/50 R15Tyre size185/65 R14
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Geo StormSpecificationOpel Omega
4150 mmLength4740 mm
1695 mmWidth1760 mm
1300 mmHeight1445 mm
1010 KgWeight1235 Kg
2450 mmWheelbase2730 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1990 Geo Storm and 1987 Opel Omega approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Opel Omega leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…