DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1990 Geo Storm vs 1990 Mazda MX-5 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda MX-5

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

52.5–53.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Geo StormSpecificationMazda MX-5
GeoMakeMazda
StormModelMX-5
1990Model year1990
CoupeBody typeCabriolet
4Seats2
2Doors2

Performance

Geo StormSpecificationMazda MX-5
12,4 s0–100 km/h8,7 s
200 km/hTop speed185 km/h
1588 ccEngine displacement1598 cc
130 HPPower115 HP
0 NmTorque135 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Geo StormSpecificationMazda MX-5
PetrolFuel typePetrol
47 ltFuel tank48 lt
13 ltUrban consumption9,6 lt
8 ltExtra-urban consumption6,1 lt
—Average consumption7,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Geo StormSpecificationMazda MX-5
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
205/50 R15Tyre size185/60 R14 82 H
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Geo StormSpecificationMazda MX-5
4150 mmLength3975 mm
1695 mmWidth1675 mm
1300 mmHeight1230 mm
1010 KgWeight955 Kg
2450 mmWheelbase2265 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1990 Geo Storm and 1990 Mazda MX-5 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda MX-5 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…