DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1990 Geo Storm vs 1990 Lada 2106 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Geo Storm

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

52.5–51.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Geo StormSpecificationLada 2106
GeoMakeLada
StormModel2106
1990Model year1990
CoupeBody type—
4Seats—
2Doors—

Performance

Geo StormSpecificationLada 2106
12,4 s0–100 km/h—
200 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1588 ccEngine displacement1300 cc
130 HPPower64 HP
0 NmTorque92 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Geo StormSpecificationLada 2106
PetrolFuel typePetrol
47 ltFuel tank0 lt
13 ltUrban consumption—
8 ltExtra-urban consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Geo StormSpecificationLada 2106
Front-wheel driveDrivetrain—
5Gears—
205/50 R15Tyre size—
YesABS—

Dimensions

Geo StormSpecificationLada 2106
4150 mmLength—
1695 mmWidth—
1300 mmHeight—
1010 KgWeight—
2450 mmWheelbase—

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1990 Geo Storm and 1990 Lada 2106 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Geo Storm leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…