1990 • Geo
Storm
Geo Storm 1.6i Turbo (130 Hp) 1990Overall Score52.5/100
1990 Geo Storm vs 1989 Geo Tracker Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1989 • Geo
Tracker
Geo Tracker 1.6 (97 Hp) 1989Overall Score51.5/100
WINNER
Geo Storm
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
52.5–51.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Geo StormSpecificationGeo Tracker
GeoMakeGeo
StormModelTracker
1990Model year1989
CoupeBody typeOff-road vehicle
4Seats—
2Doors—
Performance
Geo StormSpecificationGeo Tracker
12,4 s0–100 km/h—
200 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1588 ccEngine displacement1590 cc
130 HPPower97 HP
0 NmTorque0 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Geo StormSpecificationGeo Tracker
PetrolFuel typePetrol
47 ltFuel tank0 lt
13 ltUrban consumption—
8 ltExtra-urban consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Geo StormSpecificationGeo Tracker
Front-wheel driveDrivetrain—
5Gears3
205/50 R15Tyre size205/75 R15
YesABS—
Dimensions
Geo StormSpecificationGeo Tracker
4150 mmLength—
1695 mmWidth—
1300 mmHeight—
1010 KgWeight—
2450 mmWheelbase—
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1990 Geo Storm and 1989 Geo Tracker approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Geo Storm leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…