DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1990 Geo Storm vs 1987 Citroen CX Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Citroen CX

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

52.5–53.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Geo StormSpecificationCitroen CX
GeoMakeCitroen
StormModelCX
1990Model year1987
CoupeBody typeHatchback
4Seats5
2Doors5

Performance

Geo StormSpecificationCitroen CX
12,4 s0–100 km/h12,4 s
200 km/hTop speed175 km/h
1588 ccEngine displacement1995 cc
130 HPPower102 HP
0 NmTorque162 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Geo StormSpecificationCitroen CX
PetrolFuel typePetrol
47 ltFuel tank68 lt
13 ltUrban consumption12,0 lt
8 ltExtra-urban consumption6,9 lt
—Average consumption9,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Geo StormSpecificationCitroen CX
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
205/50 R15Tyre size195/70 R14; 185/70 R14
YesABS—

Dimensions

Geo StormSpecificationCitroen CX
4150 mmLength4650 mm
1695 mmWidth1770 mm
1300 mmHeight1360 mm
1010 KgWeight1220 Kg
2450 mmWheelbase2845 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1990 Geo Storm and 1987 Citroen CX approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Citroen CX leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…