DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1990 Geo Storm vs 1990 Alfa Romeo 33 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Alfa Romeo 33

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

52.5–53.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

GeoMakeAlfa Romeo
StormModel33
1990Model year1990
CoupeBody typeHatchback
4Seats5
2Doors5

Performance

12,4 s0–100 km/h9,8 s
200 km/hTop speed188 km/h
1588 ccEngine displacement1490 cc
130 HPPower105 HP
0 NmTorque136 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
47 ltFuel tank50 lt
13 ltUrban consumption10,4 lt
8 ltExtra-urban consumption6 lt
—Average consumption8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
205/50 R15Tyre size165/70 R13
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4150 mmLength4075 mm
1695 mmWidth1615 mm
1300 mmHeight1350 mm
1010 KgWeight940 Kg
2450 mmWheelbase2475 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1990 Geo Storm and 1990 Alfa Romeo 33 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Alfa Romeo 33 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…