DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 GAZ 31 vs 2000 Opel Campo Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Opel Campo

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

48.75–49.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

GAZ 31SpecificationOpel Campo
GAZMakeOpel
31ModelCampo
2000Model year2000
EstateBody typePick-up
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

GAZ 31SpecificationOpel Campo
21,0 s0–100 km/h18,3 s
145 km/hTop speed140 km/h
2445 ccEngine displacement2499 cc
90 HPPower100 HP
1726 NmTorque226 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

GAZ 31SpecificationOpel Campo
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
55 ltFuel tank0 lt
10,4 ltAverage consumption8,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

GAZ 31SpecificationOpel Campo
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/65 R15Tyre size—
YesABS—

Dimensions

GAZ 31SpecificationOpel Campo
4885 mmLength4980 mm
1800 mmWidth1690 mm
1576 mmHeight1710 mm
1540 KgWeight—
2800 mmWheelbase3025 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 GAZ 31 and 2000 Opel Campo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Opel Campo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…