DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Opel Campo vs 2000 GAZ 31 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Opel Campo

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

49.5–48.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Opel CampoSpecificationGAZ 31
OpelMakeGAZ
CampoModel31
2000Model year2000
Pick-upBody typeEstate
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

Opel CampoSpecificationGAZ 31
18,3 s0–100 km/h21,0 s
140 km/hTop speed145 km/h
2499 ccEngine displacement2445 cc
100 HPPower90 HP
226 NmTorque1726 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Opel CampoSpecificationGAZ 31
DieselFuel typePetrol
0 ltFuel tank55 lt
8,1 ltAverage consumption10,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Opel CampoSpecificationGAZ 31
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
—Tyre size195/65 R15
—ABSYes

Dimensions

Opel CampoSpecificationGAZ 31
4980 mmLength4885 mm
1690 mmWidth1800 mm
1710 mmHeight1576 mm
—Weight1540 Kg
3025 mmWheelbase2800 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Opel Campo and 2000 GAZ 31 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Opel Campo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…