DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Daewoo Korando vs 2000 GAZ 31 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Daewoo Korando

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

49.5–48.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

DaewooMakeGAZ
KorandoModel31
2000Model year2000
Off-road vehicleBody typeEstate
5Seats5
3Doors5

Performance

20,0 s0–100 km/h21,0 s
140 km/hTop speed145 km/h
2299 ccEngine displacement2445 cc
101 HPPower90 HP
205 NmTorque1726 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank55 lt
10,1 ltUrban consumption—
6,7 ltExtra-urban consumption—
8,8 ltAverage consumption10,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
235/75 R15Tyre size195/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4260 mmLength4885 mm
1841 mmWidth1800 mm
1840 mmHeight1576 mm
1750 KgWeight1540 Kg
2480 mmWheelbase2800 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Daewoo Korando and 2000 GAZ 31 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Daewoo Korando leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…