DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 GAZ 31 vs 2000 Mitsubishi Pajero Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mitsubishi Pajero

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

48.75–49.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

GAZMakeMitsubishi
31ModelPajero
2000Model year2000
EstateBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
5Doors3

Performance

21,0 s0–100 km/h17,0 s
145 km/hTop speed145 km/h
2445 ccEngine displacement2477 cc
90 HPPower115 HP
1726 NmTorque240 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
55 ltFuel tank71 lt
—Urban consumption13 lt
—Extra-urban consumption9,2 lt
10,4 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears5
195/65 R15Tyre size235/80 R16 S
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4885 mmLength4260 mm
1800 mmWidth1845 mm
1576 mmHeight1845 mm
1540 KgWeight1785 Kg
2800 mmWheelbase2545 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 GAZ 31 and 2000 Mitsubishi Pajero approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mitsubishi Pajero leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…