DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 GAZ 31 vs 2003 Mazda 323 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda 323

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

42.5–43.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

GAZ 31SpecificationMazda 323
GAZMakeMazda
31Model323
2003Model year2003
SedanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

GAZ 31SpecificationMazda 323
19,0 s0–100 km/h16,9 s
147 km/hTop speed168 km/h
2445 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
90 HPPower71 HP
174 NmTorque128 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

GAZ 31SpecificationMazda 323
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
70 ltFuel tank55 lt
15 ltUrban consumption8,3 lt
—Extra-urban consumption5,4 lt
9,3 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

GAZ 31SpecificationMazda 323
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/65 R15Tyre size185/65 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

GAZ 31SpecificationMazda 323
4960 mmLength4200 mm
1800 mmWidth1705 mm
1422 mmHeight1410 mm
1450 KgWeight1150 Kg
2800 mmWheelbase2610 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 GAZ 31 and 2003 Mazda 323 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda 323 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…