DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Kia Retona vs 2003 GAZ 31 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Kia Retona

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

43.5–42.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Kia RetonaSpecificationGAZ 31
KiaMakeGAZ
RetonaModel31
2003Model year2003
Off-road vehicleBody typeSedan
5Seats5
3Doors4

Performance

Kia RetonaSpecificationGAZ 31
20,5 s0–100 km/h19,0 s
120 km/hTop speed147 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement2445 cc
87 HPPower90 HP
200 NmTorque174 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Kia RetonaSpecificationGAZ 31
DieselFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank70 lt
11,5 ltUrban consumption15 lt
9,1 ltExtra-urban consumption—
—Average consumption9,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Kia RetonaSpecificationGAZ 31
4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
215/75 R15Tyre size195/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Kia RetonaSpecificationGAZ 31
4000 mmLength4960 mm
1745 mmWidth1800 mm
1835 mmHeight1422 mm
1505 KgWeight1450 Kg
2360 mmWheelbase2800 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Kia Retona and 2003 GAZ 31 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Kia Retona leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…