DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Mazda 323 vs 2003 GAZ 31 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda 323

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

43.25–42.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Mazda 323SpecificationGAZ 31
MazdaMakeGAZ
323Model31
2003Model year2003
HatchbackBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

Mazda 323SpecificationGAZ 31
16,9 s0–100 km/h19,0 s
168 km/hTop speed147 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement2445 cc
71 HPPower90 HP
128 NmTorque174 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Mazda 323SpecificationGAZ 31
DieselFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank70 lt
8,3 ltUrban consumption15 lt
5,4 ltExtra-urban consumption—
—Average consumption9,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Mazda 323SpecificationGAZ 31
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/65 R14Tyre size195/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Mazda 323SpecificationGAZ 31
4200 mmLength4960 mm
1705 mmWidth1800 mm
1410 mmHeight1422 mm
1150 KgWeight1450 Kg
2610 mmWheelbase2800 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Mazda 323 and 2003 GAZ 31 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda 323 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…