DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 GAZ 31 vs 2003 Kia Retona Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Kia Retona

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

42.5–43.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

GAZ 31SpecificationKia Retona
GAZMakeKia
31ModelRetona
2003Model year2003
SedanBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
4Doors3

Performance

GAZ 31SpecificationKia Retona
19,0 s0–100 km/h20,5 s
147 km/hTop speed120 km/h
2445 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
90 HPPower87 HP
174 NmTorque200 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

GAZ 31SpecificationKia Retona
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
70 ltFuel tank60 lt
15 ltUrban consumption11,5 lt
—Extra-urban consumption9,1 lt
9,3 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

GAZ 31SpecificationKia Retona
Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears5
195/65 R15Tyre size215/75 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

GAZ 31SpecificationKia Retona
4960 mmLength4000 mm
1800 mmWidth1745 mm
1422 mmHeight1835 mm
1450 KgWeight1505 Kg
2800 mmWheelbase2360 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 GAZ 31 and 2003 Kia Retona approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Kia Retona leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…