DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1999 Ford Windstar vs 2000 Mercury Mountaineer Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mercury Mountaineer

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

73.5–74.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FordMakeMercury
WindstarModelMountaineer
1999Model year2000
MinivanBody typeOff-road vehicle
7Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

175 km/hTop speed170 km/h
3797 ccEngine displacement3996 cc
203 HPPower213 HP
326 NmTorque326 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
95 ltFuel tank79 lt
13,8 ltUrban consumption18,2 lt
10 ltExtra-urban consumption11,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
4Gears5
205/75 R15Tyre size225/70 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5125 mmLength4790 mm
1915 mmWidth1875 mm
1790 mmHeight1830 mm
1690 KgWeight1760 Kg
3066 mmWheelbase2830 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1999 Ford Windstar and 2000 Mercury Mountaineer approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mercury Mountaineer leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…