DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Ford Windstar vs 1999 Ford Windstar Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Windstar

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

74.5–73.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FordMakeFord
WindstarModelWindstar
2000Model year1999
MinivanBody typeMinivan
7Seats7
4Doors4

Performance

175 km/hTop speed175 km/h
3797 ccEngine displacement3797 cc
203 HPPower203 HP
326 NmTorque326 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
95 ltFuel tank95 lt
13,8 ltUrban consumption13,8 lt
10 ltExtra-urban consumption10 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears4
205/75 R15Tyre size205/75 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5125 mmLength5125 mm
1915 mmWidth1915 mm
1790 mmHeight1790 mm
1690 KgWeight1690 Kg
3066 mmWheelbase3066 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Ford Windstar and 1999 Ford Windstar approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Windstar leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…