DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1999 Ford Windstar vs 1997 Ford Thunderbird Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Windstar

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

73.5–72.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FordMakeFord
WindstarModelThunderbird
1999Model year1997
MinivanBody typeCoupe
7Seats5
4Doors2

Performance

175 km/hTop speed0 km/h
3797 ccEngine displacement3797 cc
203 HPPower234 HP
326 NmTorque447 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
95 ltFuel tank72 lt
13,8 ltUrban consumption—
10 ltExtra-urban consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
4Gears5
205/75 R15Tyre size225/60 R16V
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5125 mmLength5088 mm
1915 mmWidth1847 mm
1790 mmHeight1333 mm
1690 KgWeight1704 Kg
3066 mmWheelbase2870 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1999 Ford Windstar and 1997 Ford Thunderbird approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Windstar leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…