DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2005 Ford Thunderbird vs 2004 Volkswagen Passat Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volkswagen Passat

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

78.75–79.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FordMakeVolkswagen
ThunderbirdModelPassat
2005Model year2004
CabrioletBody typeSedan
2Seats5
2Doors4

Performance

6,8 s0–100 km/h6,5 s
220 km/hTop speed250 km/h
3950 ccEngine displacement3999 cc
283 HPPower275 HP
388 NmTorque370 Nm
8Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
68 ltFuel tank80 lt
13,8 ltUrban consumption19,4 lt
10,3 ltExtra-urban consumption9,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears6
235/50 R17Tyre size225/45 R17 W
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4730 mmLength4703 mm
1829 mmWidth1746 mm
1323 mmHeight1461 mm
1748 KgWeight1665 Kg
2723 mmWheelbase2703 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2005 Ford Thunderbird and 2004 Volkswagen Passat approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volkswagen Passat leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…