DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Volkswagen Passat vs 2005 Ford Thunderbird Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volkswagen Passat

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

79.5–78.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

VolkswagenMakeFord
PassatModelThunderbird
2004Model year2005
SedanBody typeCabriolet
5Seats2
4Doors2

Performance

6,5 s0–100 km/h6,8 s
250 km/hTop speed220 km/h
3999 ccEngine displacement3950 cc
275 HPPower283 HP
370 NmTorque388 Nm
8Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
80 ltFuel tank68 lt
19,4 ltUrban consumption13,8 lt
9,5 ltExtra-urban consumption10,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainRear-wheel drive
6Gears5
225/45 R17 WTyre size235/50 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4703 mmLength4730 mm
1746 mmWidth1829 mm
1461 mmHeight1323 mm
1665 KgWeight1748 Kg
2703 mmWheelbase2723 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Volkswagen Passat and 2005 Ford Thunderbird approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volkswagen Passat leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…